Commentary on the Reader Response Method of Literary Analysis :: essays research papers

Commentary on the Reader Response order of Literary AnalysisReader response criticism raises the question of where literary meaning resides- in the literary school text, in the reader, or in the synergistic space between text and reader. In other words the text itself has no meaning until it is read and interpreted by the reader. This analysis discharge take into account the strategies employed by the author to elicit a certain response from readers. It denies the possibility that works are universal (i.e. that they exit always mean more or less the same topic to readers everywhere). Norman Holland argues that "each reader will impose his or her identity operator theme on the text, to a large extent recreating that text in the readers image." Therefore, we can understand someones drill as a function of individual(prenominal) identity. The reader response method is one I like to uptake because it allows me the reader to become one with the story either as a characte r, an on looker or both. For me the text lives in my imagination allowing me to recognise the people in the story, feel the characters emotions and walk in their shoes. Of course my flavor experiences can sometimes help me in interpreting the characters however, I father to be very careful in how I see these characters and where they live. I feel that this can hinder the way different readers see a story because not all of us are the same. I keep up to remember to acknowledge my own subjectivity in the act of reading and be aware that I am reading a literary work with my own set of beliefs, ideas, attitudes, and values which will help me to sustain biases and prejudices while interpretating the material. For instance, I have to take each story as something new and not relate each character as an speeding middle class white woman, married with two children, etc.