Learning Styles in the Educational Environment

M whatever people fill in disparate ways. Learning panaches argon various approaches or ways of breeding. There be deuce-ace types of Learning Styles. masses receive, process, and retain information by development visual, auditory, or kinesthetic methods. Visual Learners learn by using their eyes, very much focus on the eyes, and body language, gestures and facial expression of their instructors. It is also rough-cut for visual students to remain clearly focused on the material. Auditory learners, learn by dint of listening.These individuals prefer to discuss materials and often pay close fear to the pitch, tone, words and speed of which teachers deliver their messages. Kinesthetic development gives the need for a student to touch and feel in order to retain information. People who are a kinesthetic learner often become intimately agitated due to their needs for further instruction and to physically seize their hands on items relating to the material in front of them. Your environment tin can play an important role in all cultivation fashions. polar environmental factors can affect the development process in supportive and negative ways. Some learners learn better when it is bright while others are bothered by excessive light. Other learners learn better when it is exceedingly quiet while noise and activity are important for well-nigh students. The temperature of an environment can play a role also. When someone is in any case hot or too cold they comport a to a greater extent uncontrollable time concentrating and cannot learn the material indispensable. It is important for an educator to propose the right environment.Some students contrive different learning styles but they may also have different environmental preferences as well. For an example, some students may like to study when the lights are dimmed, but others may find it difficult to see. Some students may enjoy playing music and some may find it distracting and not easi ly focused. In todays nightspot many people are utilizing online learning. Online learning allows students to learn in a distant or disadvantage location. A traditionalistic signifierroom pose allows students to interact and exchange ideas.In the Quarterly Review of Distance genteelness (Fall 2006), A study compared the effects student learning styles with Web-based learning (WBL) and traditional instructor-based learning (ILB) on student knowledge and satisfaction. Student knowledge and satisfaction were measured at the end of the courses as dependent variables. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory was used to determine learning styles. The progenys revealed that students learning styles were statistically satisfying for knowledge when comparing Web-based format with instructor-based format.The results indicated students with Assimilator and Converger styles achieved better results with the Web-based format. Furthermore, this study arrange a remarkable difference in student satisfaction for learning with the Web-based format (p. 313-316). There are a lot of disadvantages when it comes to learning styles for online learners. much(prenominal) as, Students who attend online courses exit be exposed less to auditory techniques than in a traditional classroom setting.Some course materials will declare oneself you with as much visual and hands-on activities as necessary. In an online class there is a lot of passive learning done through reading text, listening to audio clips, and seeing graphics, but can totally communicate through writing, email, and chatting. In the College Student Journal (Sept 2010), the article say there was a study that investigated the relationship between students learning styles and their acquisition in two different learning environments online instruction and traditional instruction.The results indicated that a) students in the traditional learning group had higher, but not statistically meaningful higher, levels of achieve ment than students in the online learning group, b) a students learning style had no statistically significant effect on their course grades in any of the two instructional methods, and c) there was no significant fundamental interaction between the learning style and instructional method. Whether it is online or traditional when given a good learning environment most people tend to flirt with best by practicing the real thing.Next, a combination of doing and speaking rough what we learn produces a high retention rate, followed by speaking alone. The interaction and delivery methods used in online classes are different from traditional classes. In Using Learning Styles to personalize online learning, Maria Zajac states The results of a value carried turn up at Warsaw School of Economics, where every semester up to 2,000 students attend online lectures, have shown that there are no significant differences between the grades that student countenance in e-learning courses and in traditional on-campus classes (3 Dabrowski and Zajac, 2006).Although, some students indicated in a survey that e-learning methods are more convenient for them as they do not require, for instance, fashioning notes during the lecture, which they perceived as a factor influencing their concentration, there was no significant difference between the final exam scores of those taking online and on campus lectures (p. 256). If you are an auditory learner at which you learn best by hearing you may want to consider a traditional classroom setting.There are a lot of myths flowing around rough learning styles. There is one belief that learning styles is not necessary to incorporate useful knowledge. Supposedly there is no credible deduction that learning styles exist. In the Myth of Learning Styles, (Reiner 2010), the author writhes Students differ in their abilities, interests, and background knowledge, but not in their learning styles. Students may have preferences about how to learn, b ut no evidence suggests that catering to those preferences will hap to better learning (P. 32).The myth of learning styles is based on three premises learning styles are intrinsic, learning styles can be assessed learning styles can be matched to instructional styles. The myth of learning styles refers to the idea that education methods should be matched to students unique characteristics. Although individualization is desirable, learning style assumes that certain learner characteristics are intrinsic when they may in fact be the result of experiential factors. As a result, teachers may inadvertently deny low-performing students opportunities to learn.bulk of students have more than one learning style. Students should think about their learning style to identify how they learn. Learning to relate to others in their own style is important in helping us understand others and why they reply the way they do. Taking time to learn your learning style will improve the way you communica te with others. In conclusion, there are a lot of environmental factors that can affect the way you learn. Students need to agree in account that there environment in which they are learning in plays an important role of how they process there information.